Character Consistency

Test whether a character stays recognizable across scenes.

What to check

  1. Is identity preserved beyond one flattering angle?
  2. Can the model change the scene without changing the person?
  3. Which inputs and reusable profile controls are retained?

Tests and guides

ComparisonsWhat Portrait Benchmarks Actually Measure: 22,000 Human Ratings Explained

Charts from Rapidata's 35-prompt face benchmark, compared with DreamBench++ identity testing and demographic identity-drift research.

Read article →ComparisonsFive AI Image Models, One Input: 27-Output Controlled Portrait Test

Five shared portrait prompts across Seedream 4.5, GPT Image 2 Medium, Grok, Seedream V5 Lite, and V5 Pro—plus one deduplicated Lite-versus-Pro extension row.

Read article →How ToHow to Create a Consistent AI Influencer: References, Prompts and Face Checks

A reference-first and LoRA-based workflow for building a reusable identity pack, planning scene families, and rejecting drift before it reaches the feed.

Read article →ComparisonsSeedream V5 Pro vs V5 Lite vs 4.5: Same-Input Test

Seedream V5 Pro, V5 Lite, and 4.5 compared on five exact prompts with one frozen Mila input, verified prompt hashes, fixed framing, and all 15 outputs retained.

Read article →ComparisonsNano Banana 2 vs Seedream vs GPT Image 2 vs Grok: 14-Prompt Portrait Comparison

Fourteen adult portrait prompts with side-by-side outputs from Nano Banana 2, Seedream 4.5, GPT Image 2 Medium, Grok, and Seedream V5 Lite.

Read article →

Models

15-prompt output review

Seedream V5 Pro

Earned 7 of 15 editorial points in the historical Seedream review, including facial-detail and anatomy comparisons. All 15 prompts returned an output.

View tests →
15-prompt output review

Seedream V5 Lite

Earned 4 of 15 editorial points in the historical Seedream review, including clothing detail and scene composition. One prompt returned no output.

View tests →
15-prompt output review

Seedream 4.5

Earned 4 of 15 editorial points in the historical Seedream review. It retained the cafe props and bedroom pose, but added an extra leg in the kneeling portrait.

View tests →
Portrait and text-to-image tests

Grok Imagine

Produced the strongest poster layout in AI Photo's five-prompt first-output test and clean anatomy in the diner portrait. It missed the exact clock time and crate count in the constrained illustration.

View tests →